yes, no problem whatsoever in general, and the word97-testdoc loads OK,
as do some word97-files I got via email.
I even happen to have some proof :-)
http://skyscraper.fortunecity.com/parallax/967/1.gif :)
and when you're there, also visit the one with the awesome background
(which is included with Gnome) :
http://skyscraper.fortunecity.com/parallax/967/6.gif
(note: I didn't use jpg's because Gimp unfortunately doesn't do jpg's well)
> > I tried to compile some recent CVS (16/05/99) on SuSE, but that failed, I
> > guess because of libstdc++.so.2.8 missing (I did postpone the error-digging
> > for that, haven't even tested a static CVS-binary).
>
> i'm curious if the stdc++ libraries are still necessary. we had them
well, if I try (on SuSE) a dynamic binary which was build on Redhat 5.2,
it complains about libstdc++.so.2.8 IIRC.
I'll double-check that error too.
> in there because some code was using c++ iostreams -- but that *bug*
> was fixed (#164). so it may be the case that we can eliminate that
> library from the build.
>
> > However on my (base-system) Redhat 5.2 there's no problem whatsoever,
> > and AbiWord (0.5.5 and CVS 13/05/99) are doing fine.
>
> jeff
>
-- +++ greetings, Albert +++ In most countries selling harmful things like drugs is punishable. Then how come people can sell Microsoft software and go unpunished? (By hasku@rost.abo.fi, Hasse Skrifvars)
