Re: Re: C99/GCC extensions?

this is what the Visual C++ Compiler Team said when asked them about that
Hi: unfortunately the overwhelming feadback we get from the majority
of our users is that they would prefer that we focus on C++-0x instead
of on C-99. We have "cherry-picked" certain popular C-99 features
(variadic macros, long long) but beyond this we are unlikely to do
much more in the C-99 space (at least in the short-term).

chenxiajian1985

在 2011年4月16日 上午10:48，chenxiajian1985 <chenxiajian1985@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> this is what the Visual C++ Compiler Team said
> Hi: unfortunately the overwhelming feadback we get from the majority of our users is that they would prefer that we focus on C++-0x instead of on C-99. We have "cherry-picked" certain popular C-99 features (variadic macros, long long) but beyond this we are unlikely to do much more in the C-99 space (at least in the short-term).
>
>
> chenxiajian1985
>
>
>
> 发件人： Keith BOWES
> 发送时间： 2011-04-16 10:43:05
> 收件人： Fridrich Strba
> 抄送： abiword-dev
> 主题： Re: C99/GCC extensions?
>
> Je 2011-Apr-14 je 21:04, Fridrich Strba skribis:
>>
>> Yes, they are a no-go and yes we support MSVC which is not supporting C99.
> Why not? Is it just another case of M$ being too lazy to implement a
> standard correctly?
>
Received on Sat Apr 16 04:50:30 2011