Re: RFC: Planning to branch for 2.6

From: Tomas Frydrych <tf_at_o-hand.com>
Date: Fri Sep 14 2007 - 10:26:51 CEST

J.M. Maurer wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I wanted to merge the annotation support back into trunk, but some
> people suggested it might be a better idea to branch off for 2.6 first.
> After that, we could merge annotations, the new build system, etc into
> trunk.
>
> This is a sane suggestion, given the time it already took us to release
> 2.6. If we add unstable features now, it would take even longer. If
> annotations and the new buildsys work out well, we could do a quick 2.8
> for a change (like that's gonna happen :-P).

I agree, we should get 2.6 out soon, and adding new stuff at this stage
is likely to push everything back.

> Anyone against branching for 2.6?

Are there any bugs that we want fixed before the branch ?

Tomas
Received on Fri Sep 14 10:27:29 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 14 2007 - 10:27:30 CEST