getting rid of the HAVE_GNOME define

Hello,

i have spent some time throwing out bogus HAVE_GNOME optional code and
implementing fallbacks for missing functionality in the gtk-only
build. If there are no objections I'll consider replacing the remaing
ones (that we are not able to get rid off without losing
functionality) with HAVE_GNOMEVFS, HAVE_BONOBO and HAVE_LIBGNOME
defines.

At this point the gtk and gnome builds does already offer basically
the same functionality, the remaining differences are
+ abiwidget bonobo control (-> HAVE_BONOBO)
+ gtk-only build not using gnomeapp, which takes care of initialising
atk[1] (-> HAVE_LIBGNOME)
+ handling of remote documents, mostly abstracted away by using
gsf/goffice but some bits remaining (-> HAVE_GNOMEVFS)

[1] might be mislead here

Cheers,
Rob
Received on Sat Sep 30 15:31:24 2006