>
>
> It would be helpful if you could point out stuff you'd like to see
> different next time. Maybe i can ask you on irc about details?
>
> On a more general note, i've been sending in early versions of UI
> patches in the hope of getting feedback. From watching other projects
> i've had the impression that UI changes can sometimes lead to a lot
> of controversy. If that's different over here, i'll just work on
> stuff until i'm perfectly happy and then pass the patch on.
>
> What do you think?
> Rob
>
Hi Rob,
Well it's pretty obvious that your patches have so far always
improved broken stuff. If it's not obvious we'll have debates.
I think we'd like to see finished patches unless your proposed a radical
change to an otherwise HIG compliant dialog.
Cheers
Martin
> Am 29.09.2004 um 01:45 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
>
>>
>> Some lil' issues in here, but looks a lot better than what we had.
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Marc
>>
>> Gladify Styles Dialog (rob)
>>
>> CVS:
>> CVS: Enter Log. Lines beginning with `CVS:' are removed
>> automatically
>> CVS:
>> CVS: Committing in .
>> CVS:
>> CVS: Modified Files:
>> CVS: src/wp/ap/unix/GNUmakefile.am
>> CVS: src/wp/ap/unix/ap_UnixDialog_Styles.cpp
>> CVS: src/wp/ap/unix/ap_UnixDialog_Styles.glade
>> CVS: src/wp/ap/unix/ap_UnixDialog_Styles.h
>> CVS:
>>
>>
>> Op di, 28-09-2004 te 22:53 +0200, schreef robsta@stereolyzer.net:
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > chatted a bit with martin today, he motivated me to do anonther
>> take
>> > on the styles dialog.
>> >
>> > I wasn't happy with the ui design of the previous patch anyways,
>> this
>> > is prolly as good as it gets for 2.2, ui-wise.
>> >
>> > Rob
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>
Received on Wed Sep 29 12:00:57 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 29 2004 - 12:00:57 CEST