Re: strings to .po

From: donkiszot_at_fiz.coi.waw.pl
Date: Mon Jan 26 2004 - 04:40:29 EST

Next message: Hubert Figuiere: "Re: commit (HEAD): UUID hashes"

Previous message: Raphael Finkel: "strings to .po"
Maybe in reply to: Raphael Finkel: "strings to .po"
Next in thread: Karl Ove Hufthammer: "Re: strings to .po"
Next in thread: Rui Miguel Seabra: "Re: strings to .po"
Reply: Karl Ove Hufthammer: "Re: strings to .po"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

For me .stings are easier for translating, because I can modify .strings
and I have result of translation at onces - "on line" (after restartnig
AbiWord).
Please do not remove .strings - let the scipt converts them automatically.

Cheers,

-- 
Andrzej Pruszynski
aka donkiszot -> Linux#270512
Raphael Finkel napisał(a):
> I attach a Perl script that takes a strings file and a po file (you can
> use any language's po file, or generate a new one using update.pl -pot
> in the po directory) and sends a new .po file to stdout.  It doesn't
> modify either input file, so there is no risk trying it.>
> Raphael
>
> ----- Forwarded message from "J.M. Maurer"
> <j.m.maurer_at_student.utwente.nl> -----
>
> For translations that only are up to date in the .strings file: maybe
> someone could come up with a script to turn a .strings file into a .po
> file? Two different translation mechanisms is hard to maintain, and I'd
> like to see the .strings files removed from CVS altogether...

Next message: Hubert Figuiere: "Re: commit (HEAD): UUID hashes"
Previous message: Raphael Finkel: "strings to .po"
Maybe in reply to: Raphael Finkel: "strings to .po"
Next in thread: Karl Ove Hufthammer: "Re: strings to .po"
Next in thread: Rui Miguel Seabra: "Re: strings to .po"
Reply: Karl Ove Hufthammer: "Re: strings to .po"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 26 2004 - 04:41:52 EST